Advantages:
    (a)   The system reduced harmful emissions from the petrol 
            engines  almost immediately after installation and continued to 
            maintain the reduction throughout the six month period (see 
            charts A & B).
    (b)   The diesel engine showed an immediate reduction of visible 
            smoke. Prior to the installation, the 1985 bus was a very 
            heavy smoker, putting out clouds of thick black smoke. 
           After installation, the smoke could BARELY BE SEEN 
           WITH THE NAKED EYE (see Chart C).

Disadvantages:              NONE NOTED
 

Safety:                              NO SAFETY HAZARDS ENCOUNTERED

Savings:
      (a)   Tangible savings:  With such reductions in emission output, 
            clearly better combustion is being realized.  With correct 
            carburetion/fuel pump adjustment, this increased efficiency 
            can easily be converted into substantial FUEL SAVINGS.
       (b)  Intangible savings:  Less pollution in the atmosphere

Project Results:
       (a)  Conclusions:  The MAGNETIZER fuel treatment system 
              demonstrated the ability to reduce harmful emissions in both 
              petrol and diesel engines.

        (b)  Recommendations:  We are RECOMMENDING the 
               MAGNETIZER fuel system be APPROVED for AIR FORCE 
               USE.  Further recommend that a NATIONAL stock number 
               be assigned.
(As a result of testing, a stock number was assigned, and this product is now available for military use)

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
(Latin America)

Magnetizer CVS-75 Test Summary

Location:	Comision De Des Contaminacion De La Cividad De Santiago De Chile (Chilean EPA)
Date:	January 6, 1992
Vehicle:	1600 cc 1990 Chevy Luv
Test Identification:	Gasoline:  93 Octane Constant Volume Sampling (CVS) Cycle FTP-75, Stabilized Phase
Results:	Average fuel efficiency {KM/Liter} without MAGNETIZER	8.50
	Average fuel efficiency WITH MAGNETIZER	10.10
	PERCENTAGE INCREASE INFUEL EFFICIENCY	18.8%

1.1              Vehicle Identification.	Make:	Chevrolet
	Model:	LUV 1600
	Year:	1990
	Type:	Pick-Up, simple cabin
	Weight:	1410 Kg
	Tag:	D1-2492
1.2              Test Identification.	Fuel:	Gasoline, 93 Octane, Leaded
	Method:	CVS (Constant Volume Sampling)
	Cycle:	FTP-75, Stabilized phase
Measurement units.	Carbon moxoxide:	[g/km]
	Carbon dioxide:	[g/km]
	Nitroxide:	[g/km]
	Hydrocarbons	[g/km]
	Fuel consumption:	[Liter]
	Traveled distance:	[Km]
	Fuel efficiency:	[km/l]
	Ambient temperature:	[°C]
	Ambient pressure:	[mmHs]
	Ambient relative humidity:	[%]
	Duration of test:	[min]

1.3              Type of analyzing instruments used.
Carbon monoxide:	Infrared non-dispersive
Carbon dioxide:	Infrared non-dispersive
Nitroxide	Chemioluminscent
Hydrocarbons:	Detection through flame ionization

TABLE 3.3.  AVERAGE COMPARATIVE VALUES

Units of Measurement	Test 1	Test 2	Test 3
Fuel Consumption [L]	0.64	0.60	0.60
Fuel Density [g/l]	738.00	738.00	738.00
Distance for test [km]	6.20	6.20	6.20
Time for test	14.70	14.70	14.70
Ambient Temp [°C]	30.00	31.00	32.00
Barometric Pres [mmHg]	721.00	719.00	719.00
Relative Humidity [%]	35.00	25.00	23.50
Calculated Values
Carbon Monoxide [g/km]	52.50	52.70	55.90
Carbon Dioxide [g/km]	356.80	369.40	373.40
Hydrocarbons [g/km]	3.40	3.00	3.20
Nitroxides [g/km]	1.20	0.90	1.40
Fuel Efficiency [km/l]	9.70	10.30	10.30

Units of Measurement	Base Line Without Magnetizer	Base Line With Magnetizer
Carbon Monoxide [g/km]	57.4	53.7
Carbon Dioxide {g/km]	366.7	366.5
Hydrocarbons [g/km]	4	3.2
Nitroxides [g/km]	0.6	1.2
Fuel Efficiency [km/l]	8.5	10.1

Conclusion:	Test averages show that MAGNETIZER reduced fuel consumption by 18.8%
Comments:	The determined indexes of emissions correspond to the ones obtained with the cycle test FTP-75 in the stabilized phase (II), tests between 505 and 1371 seconds.  In this test (velocity v/s time), the vehicle travels on rollers which simulate the rotational power and inertia of the vehicle.  The measuring process used is the one established by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency, USA).

Emissions Testing by Mercedes Benz - Argentina S.A.

Dated: November 10th, 1993 Location:  Buenos Aires Representative:  Dr. Marcelo Breitman Vehicle:  Diesel Engine Bus

	CO @ 600 rpm	CO @ 2800 rpm	HC @ 600 rpm	HC @ 2800 rpm
WITHOUT MAGNETIZER	0.09	0.14	30.00	46.00
WITH  MAGNETIZER	0.04	0.06	12.00	16.00

I’m pleased to inform you that MERCEDES BENZ has performed the above test on a diesel engine bus equipped with sets of DFE-6 plus TCE (Magnetizer diesel fuel energizer, truck coolant energizer).  Even though it was a perfectly tuned engine, the results were very good, as you can see.  A reduction in the consumption was not tested, but stoichimetrically, there must be a substantial reduction in consumption.

Guatemalan Magnetizer Report - Nissan (Dicorsa Plant)

Date	April 13, 1991
Location:	Dicorsa (Nissan)
Emission Analyzer:	Sun EPA 75

BFR = Before fitting Magnetizer

Vehicle	Idle CO	Idle HC	CO @ 2500 rpm	HC @ 2500 rpm
Suzuki Swift 1991, 1298 cc BFR	3.00	295.00	1.60	170.00
Suzuki Swift 1991, 1298cc AFT	1.60	170.00	0.15	100.00
Nissan 200 SX Turbo BFR	0.3	210	0.3	70
Nissan 200 SX Turbo AFT	0.2	165	0.2	90
Mitsubishi L300 1400cc BFR	6.2	390	4.2	180
Mitsubishi L300 1400cc AFT	3.6	330	1.8	90
Chevrolet LUV 1800 BFR	1.1	240	3.6	320
Chevrolet LUV 1800 AFT	0.8	250	1	180
Volkswagen 1600cc BFR	3.8	320	7	320
Volkswagen 1600cc AFT	2.8	270	6.8	250

ATF:  After fitting Magnetizer

  OEM Malaysian Saga Automobile Factory - Emission Tests

location:                           Vehicle Testing Laboratory – SIRIM,                            Malaysia Date:                          June 1993 Vehicle:                           Proton 1.5S Megavalve Engine:                          4 Cylinder, carbureted, gasoline powered Miles:                          New vehicle

	Hydrocarbons	Carbon Monoxide	Power [Kw]
BEFORE MAGNETIZER	130	2	2 58 Kw
AFTER MAGNETIZER	100	1.4	1.4 59 Kw

PENSKE Dyno Testing - Race Car Engine - February 17, 1989

Without Magnetizer
Torque – Ft/Lbs	Horsepower
320	534
327	560
331	599
336	640
358	656
318	666
Average                    328.3	609.2
With Magnetizer
Torque – Ft/Lbs.	Horsepower
334	541
330	656
332	600
337	642
332	664
321	672
Average:                  331	614

VTEC LABORATORIES, Inc. - Germany & USA
Fuel Efficiency Tests of the Magnetizer Fuel Energizer

1.0           Test Description
The described test was conducted inside a large facility under controlled conditions.  The exhaust gasses were vented outside the building.  All the parameters of the test were kept constant throughout the program.

1.1          Test Set Up
A Kohler generator was connected to an external graduated fuel tank that was kept at approximately the same height as the carburetor of the generator.  A calibrated flow meter was inserted between the fuel tank and the generator.  A load bank consisting of lights and heater was attached to the generator.  The generator was placed on a small table approximately 30 inches above the floor.

1.2           The Generator

An electric portable Kohler generator with the following specifications was used for this project:

Model 3.5 mm65
S/N 260058
KVA 3.5
3600 RP
Watts 3500

The load bank consisted of five 300 watt light bulbs and a 900 watt heater which was approximately at 70% load.  Each load source had an electrical plug at the end of the wire which was plugged into the generator.

The generator had two receptacles rated at 120 Volt, 15 Amp maximum.  Each receptacle had a load bank plugged into it.

No adjustments were made to the generator prior to the start of the test program.

1.3             Flowmeter

A separate line was run from the remote fuel tank directly to the carburetor with a flowmeter and a 12 inch steel line that ran in between to make the attachment of the MAGNETIZER unit.  The fuel pump was by-passed.  The flowmeter was manufactured by Brooks Instruments with the following specifications:

S/N   99223
Tube Number  R-215-A
Metering viscosity 0.640 cS
Date of Calibration 6.28.90
Flow Range   0.011 to 1.025 (liq) gal/hrs

The gasoline used was CITGO unleaded 87 octane.

1.4           Exhaust Gas Analyzer

The exhaust gas from the generator was analyzed for oxygen and carbon monoxide.  A stainless steel tube was inserted in the exhaust pipe of the generator.  The gas analysis was through a system that had a pump to draw the gasses and a cold trap/drierite system to remove the water.

Gasses were continually drawn through the system with continuous display readings.  The following gas analysis equipment was used:

Servomex Oxygen Analyzer Model 540A
Horiba Carbon Monoxide Analyzer Model PIR-2000

2.0           Results

The generator was operated for three days before the described test results were obtained.  This was done in an effort to “break-in” the engine and work out any problems that could result prior to testing.  Readings were taken as required when the MAGNETIZER was installed and then removed.  The generator was run continuously.  The results are for two sets of runs.

Time of Reading	Flow Range	Peak Flow	Amps	Volts	O2	CO	W-W/O
14.45	65-70	70	21	117.5	12.9	12	W
15.56	100-110	110	21.2	117.6	14.1	7	W/O
16.08	65-70	70	21.4	117.5	14.1	5	W
16.48	95-100	100	21.2	117.5	14.1	6.5	W/O

Each time the MAGNETIZER was removed or added, it was necessary to re-adjust the carburetor.

Based on the above information, the MAGNETIZER device for this test reduced the fuel consumption by approximately 26%.

Summary

At MAGNETIZER, we are quite pleased with the V-TEC Laboratories test resulting in a 26% drop in fuel consumption achieved through the use of our Fuel Energizer.

What is truly amazing is the reduction in gasoline consumption while the electrical output of the gasoline driven generator remained almost perfectly constant.  The wattage, a product of amps time volts, varied from the average of 2491 watts by less than one percent.  It should be noted that maximum wattage occurred when the generator was equipped with a MAGNETIZER.  During this run, the carbon monoxide was at its lowest level.  This is to be expected since carbon monoxide is oxidized to carbon dioxide.  With any internal combustion engine, maximum output will occur when carbon monoxide is minimized and carbon dioxide is maximized which is in accordance with stoichiometric principles.

In using a gasoline driven generator, the electrical load can be matched to the output very closely, as indicated above.  Vehicular testing with friction and mechanical transmission difficulties could not have generated such precise results.

The MAGNETIZER unit was mounted on a 12” length of steel tubing.  It is possible that the slight improvement in fuel economy in the fourth run after the MAGNETIZER was due to residual magnetism.  However, the variation between MAGNETIZER equipped runs and non-MAGNETIZER runs were so large as to make the results of residual magnetization inconsequential.  Future runs should be conducted utilizing a non-ferrous gas line.  Since the lines of magnetic force penetrate these materials easier, the results will be higher than the 26% results that we have already achieved.

Results were conducted on test equipment calibrated to the National Institute for Standards testing requirement, formerly The National Bureau of Standards.

AUTOLATINA Testing - Ford/Volkswagen Partnership

Dated:	October 13, 1993
Location:	Argentina S.A
Representative:	Dr. Marcelo Breitman
Reported by:	Mr. Alfredo Martone, General Manager of Manufacture
Vehicle:	Volkswagen Quantum

Comments: Mr. Martone also confirms that the consumption of gasoline dropped by 17%.

SIRIM / MALAYSIA Test Reports

VEHICLE DATA - TEST DATE: 5/20/99

Manufacturer	PROTON
Vehicle Type	Sedan
Trade Name	ISWARA 1.3S
Model & Chassis No	C21ASN – D075504
Registration No.	WFU 3714
Drive Wheel	Front
Engine Model	4G13P
Engine No.	PI 2000
Engine Type	Four cylinders in line, SOHC
Capacity	1298 c.c
Fuel Supply System	Carburetor
Ignition System	Electronic
Mileage	77600 km

Test Unit: Magnetizer Auto EPM TEST SUMMARY: •     Fuel Consumption decreased by 3.29%. •     Exhaust Emissions at idling Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 10.4% and Hydrocarbon        (HC) decreased by 4.3%. •     Exhaust Emissions at 90 km/h Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 29.2% and Hydrocarbon        (HC) decreased by 22.4%. •     Power output increased by 6.6%. Original full text report on file

VEHICLE DATA - TEST DATE: 5/20/99

Manufacturer	PROTON
Vehicle Type	Sedan
Trade Name	PERDANA 2.0i
Model & Chassis No.	E5S & PLIESARRTB 013775
Registration No.	WFU 6242
Drive Wheel	Front
Engine Model	4G63P
Engine No.	DT 5079
Engine Type	Four cylinders in line, SOHC
Capacity	1997 c.c
Fuel Supply System	Injection
Ignition System	Electronic
Mileage	64443 km

Test Unit: Magnetizer Auto EPM TEST SUMMARY: •   Fuel Consumption decreased by 6.62%. •   Exhaust Emissions at idling Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 14.3% and Hydrocarbon      (HC) decreased by 16.6%. •   Exhaust Emissions at 90 km/h Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 22.7% and Hydrocarbon      (HC) decreased by 22.6%.   Original full text report on file

VEHICLE DATA
TEST DATE: 5/20/99
Manufacturer	KIA MOTOR
Vehicle Type	Four Wheeler
Trade Name	KIA SPORTAGE 2.0
Model & Chassis No.	KNE JA5535 T5 - 414656
Registration No.	WES 4065
Drive Wheel	4x4
Engine
Model
Engine No.
Engine Type	Four cylinders in line, DOHC 15 Valve
Capacity	1998 c.c
Fuel Supply System	Injection
Ignition System
Mileage	23766 km

Test Unit: Magnetizer Auto EPM  TEST SUMMARY: •   Fuel Consumption decreased by 6.11%. •   Exhaust Emissions at idling Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 100% and Hydrocarbon      (HC) decreased by 67%. •   Exhaust Emissions at 90 km/h Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Hydrocarbon (HC) remain the      same.  •   Power output increased by 2.3%. Original full text report on file         EPA Test/ SRI LANKA (Ceylon) Magnetizer Diesel Smoke Opacity Emission Test conducted at  United Motor Car, Sri Lanka (Ceylon) (Importer of Mitsubishi Motor Cars) Magnetizer Diesel Smoke Opacity Emission Test (Conducted by Sri Lanka(Ceylon) EPA) Vehicle One      Date:            May 17, 1999      Model:          Isuzu Pick Up Truck                           (Owned by Managing Director of Department of Transportation, Sri Lanka (Ceylon)) Lucas Hartridge Free Acceleration Test EEC72/306 Before Magnetizer EES:            30.1 HSU (opacity) Average After Magnetizer EES:                11.8 HSU (opacity) Average Diesel Emission Reduction: 60.7% Vehicle Two Date:                May 17, 1999 Model:              Toyota Pick Up Truck    (Owned by Director of Sri Lankan (Ceylon) EPA) Lucas Hartridge Free Acceleration Test EEC72/306 Before Magnetizer EES:           56.4 HSU (Opacity) Average After Magnetizer EES:              21.7 HSU (Opacity) Average Diesel Emission Reduction:     61.2% Nepal Magnetizer – Emissions Testing Date:                                            April/May 1999 Magnetizer                                   Intercraft Pvt., Ltd. Representative:                           Kathmandu, Nepal Test Equipment:                          Nepal – EPA – Protocol Presented Technical Men:         Commissioner Motor Traffic – Nepal Emission Testing of Petrol Vehicles

Vehicle No. Vehicle Type Before Magnetizer After 1000 Miles % Reduction     CO HC CO HC CO HC NA.A.CHA1851 Toyota Car 6.25 630 0.01 80 99.85% 87.30% BA.A.CHA5152 Mazda Car 5.50 1070 0.13 1290 97.85% (+) 20.5% BA.A.YAN.7684 Maruti Car 6.49 240 0.12 320 98.15% (+) 33.3% BA.A.YAN.3708 Maruti Car 10.28 500 0.43 110 95.82% 78% BA.A.YAN.9158 Maruti Van 8.32 450 0.52 20 93.75% 95.55% BA.A.YAN.3042 Maruti Car 5.21 360 0.92 0.12 14.29% 91.60% BA.A.JHA.3965 Maruti Car 0.14 240 0.12 280 14.29% (+) 16.6% Average Reduction of CO:                 83.12%                 Average Reduction of HC:  38.97% Emission Testing of Diesel Vehicles

Vehicle No.	Vehicle Type	Before Magnetizer (HSU)	After 100 Miles (HSU)	% Reduction (HSU)
BA.A.GYAN.1931	Mitsubishi Jeep	98.40%	11.50%	88.31%
BA.A.CHA.7998	Land Cruiser Jeep	98.00%	23.30%	76.22%
BA.A.YAN.4399	Toyota Car	100%	37.80%	62.20%
BA.A.JHA.5128	Nissan Jeep	98.50%	39.40%	60.00%
SA.A.JHA.62	Land Cruiser Jeep	92.00%	38.90%	57.72%
BA.A.YAN.8931	Toyota Jeep	81.00%	47.90%	40.86%
BA.A.JHA.4273	Mitsubishi Jeep	98.10%	56.30%	42.61%

Average Reduction of HSU (Smoke):  61.13%

When Magnetizers are installed, there is a stabilization period that the engine goes through (cleaning) which can and often does raise the emissions as it goes through this cleaning process.  This cleaning process removes existing carbon and varnish that has been deposited in the fuel and combustion chamber over time.  When the Magnetizers are installed, this build-up starts to dissolve and some goes out the tail pipe while some of the deposits end up in the oil.  This contaminates the oil at a faster rate than normal and requires that the oil be changed to see the maximum benefit.  Had these vehicles followed Magnetizer’s proper testing protocol the results in emissions reductions would have been more in line with Magnetizers expectations

MAGNETIZER CHINA RAILWAY REPORT SUMMARY TEST DATE:  3-12-97 ORGANIZATION:  Locomotive and Car Research Institute, China Academy of                                    Railway Science MODEL:  Tung Fong 4, Serial # 2502  Locomotive FUEL:  Diesel During the test period, from June 1996 to March 1997, the average savings were 4.88%, with the peak speed at 120 km/hr.  In the month of April 1997 the peak speed rose to 160 km/hr with average fuel savings of 5.91%.  The highest recorded savings with the Magnetizer was 9.11% in December 1996. As related in the bar diagram, it took approximately 3 months (or 90 days) to see a meaningful reduction in fuel usage.  Also, at the first maintenance inspection after Magnetizer units were utilized, it was found that the diesel injectors had less carbon and the residue that remained was soft. The conversion of hard carbon deposits into a softer form is to be expected, since chemical producers of carbon block use magnetized fuel to produce a finer, softer form of carbon. The conversion of hard carbon deposits to soft carbon residue is helpful in increasing useful engine life. BRAZIL BUS TEST Agency – CREA – PA  BRAZIL   (EPA Testing)

Testing Engineers:	Heleno Teixeria, Mechanical Engineer CREA – 3538-D
Vehicle:	Omnibus Scania 1511 (Standard Diesel Passenger Bus)
Vehicle Registration:	Transporte Boa  Esperance
Magnetizer Systems:	Commercial Diesel  Bus System
Test Date:	May 1 through June 7,2003
Test Period:	24 Days

Test Length: 6,700 Km Results:           Without Magnetizer 2.874 Km/L           With Magnetizer 3.452 Km/L           Fuel Savings  20.11% Substantial reduction in diesel exhaust was noted but no data or opacity was provided. Original full test in file   BRAZIL: TRANSPORTE SÃO LUIZ - ANALISE DISCO TACOGRAFO  25-10-03/23-11-03

RESUMO DE ANÁLISEDATA:  25/10/03

CARRO	KILOMETERAGEM	LITROS	AUTOOMIA
323	6.839 KM	2.939 L	2.326
325/COM MAGNETIZER	6.397 KM	2.517 L	2.541
407	5.778 KM	2.433 L	2.374
		AUTONOMIA	9.36%

RESUMO DE ANÁ LISE 23/11/03

CARRO	KILOMETRAGEM	LITROS	AUTONOMIA
323	6.015 KM	2.520 L	2.386
325	6.223 KM	2.634 L	2.363
407/COM MAGNETIZER	6.027 KM	2.381 L	2.531
		AUTONOMIA	9.35%

COMENTÁRIOS      •   O ônibus 407 após o segundo teste,  fez 9,36% a mais de economia em relação aos            ônibus       323-325, sem magnetizer.      •   No primeiro teste  o ônibus 325 com Sistema Magnetizer instalado fez 10% a mais de           economia em relação ao ônibus 407, o contrário que aconteceu no segundo teste.      •   A conclusão dos 2 (dois) teste mostra que o Sistema Magnetizer instalado nos dois           diferentes ônibus por 28 dias para teste, fez  cada um 10% de economia. A prova é clara           que o  Sistema Magnetizer age conforme as declarações dos fabricantes, alem da           economia reduz a emissão dos poluentes  e fumaça preta do diesel.      1983 FORD F-100 – 158,000 MILES CARBURETED, 300 C.I., STRAIGHT 6 CYLINDER AFE-1 ADDED AT 41,000 MILES, TCE ADDED AT 67,000 MILES Neither engine nor radiator has had any repairs prior to this tear down due to a broken piston skirt.  Engine inspected by Performance Machine Shop, Austin, Texas.  Tear down and assembly done by Quality Automotive, Geronimo, Texas.  Inspection and photos by master mechanic, Paul Harborth (210-379-0581). PHOTO #1: Water jacket inspection after removal of water pump.  Normally an engine with this many miles looks like a cavern full of stalactites from pitting and scale.  Water jacket requires no acidizing. PHOTO #2: Face of valves showing no carbon build-up.  Original head gasket still in place.  Notice clean water jacket and spark plug holes. PHOTO #3: Top view of piston in the block.  No carbon build-up.  A perfect valve seating indentation is still clearly visible in the recess of the piston.  No build-up in the water jacket holes.  Notice the original Ford inspection stamp still  on the engine block. PHOTO #4: After removal of the piston, cylinder walls still perfect due to no grit from carbon allowed to get into the oil. All parties concerned in the evaluation of this engine found it difficult to believe this engine, with this many miles, was still in this good of condition.  This engine was still in perfect working order and never used any oil between routine changes.  This tear down was due entirely to a broken piston skirt.

California Emissions Test  Tested 2001

HC reduced 84% Nitrous Oxide reduced 72% Carbon Monoxide reduced 83%

One of the greatest prices we pay for transportation is not the cost of fuel (which continues to rise), but the cost to our health (which continues to deteriorate) as a result of smog. The smog and chemical pollution which inundates our atmosphere is making many people ill. It is a matter of scientific record that the number of children developing asthma is on the increase. Empirical tests have shown that all over the world, city-dwellers are prone to pernicious respiratory ailments. The smog is caused by transportation, building and industry emissions. Since emissions are unburned fuel, logically, if the fuel could be burned more completely, there would not only be less smog, but greater fuel economy.

Magnetizer created a break-through solution as long ago as 1986 when it developed the monopole EPM  Engine Performance Maximizer.

The Magnetizer Engine Performance Maximizer has been called "one of the finest innovations in engine maintenance."

EPMs are currently being used and recognized by many authorities such as the US Air Force, State, Federal and International Governments. Municipalities such as the California's Berkeley Police and the Berkeley Sanitation Department also employ these systems to create cleaner air and save a great deal of fuel and money.

As indicated by a recent California Emissions Test (shown in the graph above), the Hydrocarbons were reduced by 84%, the Carbon Monoxide was reduced by 83%, and the Nitrous Oxide was reduced by 72%! Once Magnetizer's EPM (Engine Performance Maximizer) stabilizes between 200-500 miles, the emissions almost completely disappear.